Monday, May 30, 2016

"The Nice Guys"

By Matt Duncan
Coastal View News

This is a strange movie. I walked into the theater, and there was a preview on for a new Dinesh D’Souza movie explaining how Hillary Clinton is part of a massive conspiracy to enslave us, or something like that (for a while I couldn’t tell whether this movie was supposed to be a satire). That was followed by a preview for a bizarre-looking new Oliver Stone movie starring Nicolas Cage, which was followed by a few other Twilight-Zone-feeling-inducing previews. I thought, “Am I in the right theater?”

But then after two more hours it all made sense. Well, it made sense in that nothing over the past two hours and 10 minutes made a lot of sense. Not necessarily in a bad way. “The Nice Guys” is strange in a charming, almost “The Big Lebowski” sort of way (though that’s too much of a compliment by association, I think). But it is strange.

It’s the 70s. It’s L.A. Jackson Healy (Russell Crowe) breaks arms and bashes skulls for a living—basically, his job is to “send messages” to creeps, lowlifes, and really, anyone he gets paid to bash. Holland March (Ryan Gosling) is a highly unreliable, alcoholic private investigator, who makes a lot of his money by doing things like helping a senile old woman find her dead husband that she forgot died years ago.

Healy and March get tangled up because they are both looking for Amelia (Margaret Qualley). At first Healy gets paid to rough up March to get him to stop looking for Amelia, but then a couple of tough guys come and rough up Healy for having something to do with Amelia, and that pisses Healy off, so he starts looking for Amelia, too. Healy thinks he might as well ask March for help, so, hours removed from the original beating, they start working together. Yeah, it’s complicated.

It turns out Amelia has been hanging out with a bunch of porn stars. Actually, she may be a porn star herself. Or maybe she is just a naïve activist who, oddly enough, uses porn as a vehicle for her political message (March rightly queries her about the wisdom of making a porn about the plot.). At any rate, Amelia is around, sort of, but she keeps running away and thinks her mom is trying to kill her. See, her mom is the head of the Department of Justice, which of course Amelia hates because it means mom is “the man” and part of a vast oppressive capitalist conspiracy to do something super nefarious, including kill Amelia and her friends because they (a) do porn, (b) might expose her as a fraud, (c) might embarrass her, or (d) all of the above.

Healy and March can’t keep their heads around this whole thing (especially March, who is drunk all the time). Luckily they have March’s preteen daughter, Holly (Angourie Rice), by their side. She is sensible and organized, and knows how to drive a car. So she ends up doing a lot of the heavy lifting.

This giant web of sleaze and corruption ends up extending pretty far, not just to the porn and private investigator industries, but also to government and big business outfits. Healy and March end up being, by comparison, the nice guys—just hoping they don’t finish last.

Again, “The Nice Guys” is strange. It is strange because it is a real mishmash of genres, styles, types of humor, and many other things. One moment it is ultra realistic, and the next a giant honeybee is riding in the back seat. But strangeness is an asset for this movie. It makes it just offbeat enough to mask some of the more conventional, cheesy (in a bad way), and potentially tiresome aspects of this movie.

This mask would have been an entirely too flimsy disguise if it weren’t for the charisma of the cast. All three stars—Crowe, Gosling, and Rice—are so easy to watch. Especially Gosling. He is hilarious in an inept yet clever way. He makes a thoroughly goofy character somehow seem cool.

All of this feels sort of like a scam. The plot is silly (and clichéd), the script is pretty uneven, there is no stylistic unity, and only a certain percentage of the jokes land. Yet, by shear stroke of personality, we get drawn in.


Whatever. I kind of liked it.

Thursday, May 5, 2016

"The Jungle Book"

By Matt Duncan
Coastal View News

Stories like “The Jungle Book” are precious—they are treasures. For so many of us, they are iconic, nostalgic, formative, and not to be messed with.

One thing that is kind of cool about “The Jungle Book” in particular—the story, that is (I assume we are all familiar)—is this series of tests or temptations that the little man cub, Mowgli (Neel Sethi), faces. Each peril is a little bit different, packs its own punch, and has its own moral.

There is of course the peril of Shere Khan (Idris Elba) throughout. This awful tiger wants to kill Mowgli just because Mowgli is a man cub. It’s a rush to judgment, sure, but he is after all a tiger. Plus, someone has to be the big baddie.

But then, as Mowgli flees his home to get away from Shere Khan, he faces a series of less obvious, less straightforward trials. The snake, Kaa (Scarlett Johansson), attempts to woo Mowgli into a false sense of security—she tempts him with comfort.

Baloo (Bill Murray) also offers comfort to Mowgli, but in a different way. Whereas Kaa tests Mowgli’s ability to sense danger or discern who can be trusted, Baloo (who can be trusted) presents Mowgli with the allure of laziness—a complacent sort of comfort. It’s the pleasure of just staying put and taking it easy through life.

King Louie (Christopher Walken) offers Mowgli power. Louie—a mix between Donald Trump and a mob boss in this one (well, maybe that’s all the same)—wants fire, and promises to share his dominion with Mowgli if he helps. (But, of course, we all know the power hungry aren’t good at sharing.)

In each of these cases, there is something good (or seemingly good): Comfort, ease, power. It’s nice to be reassured when we are scared (though not squeezed to death ala Kaa). It’s great to lay back and take it easy with friends. And who doesn’t like a little say-so here and there? Still, these are temptations. If Mowgli holds them too close, or becomes too wrapped up in them, he will perish.

Perhaps his biggest temptation is to stay put—to not move on when he ought to. He faces this temptation when Bagheera (Ben Kingsley) urges him to leave his wolf pack and go to the man village. And, according to the standard version of the story, he faces it at the end, too. Mowgli has to move on. Staying put is not an option in life.

My main problem with this rendition of “The Jungle Book” is that it is not sufficiently reimagined. There is no new angle or spin—not even a fresh thematic or narrative emphasis. Look, I like “The Jungle Book” story. Who doesn’t? But this movie just feels like a CG version of the old one. Or, even worse, it feels like a somewhat clumsy CG copycat of the old one (with a lamer, lazier ending). I guess I had hoped that someone with a fresh take on the story would breathe new life into it.

You might respond, “So what if it is nothing new. A good story is a good story.” Maybe, but it’s kind of like when there is this really great story that your grandpa used to tell, but that your Uncle Bill starts telling because he thinks he can, and he tells it in this weird booming voice as if he is adding his own little twist. It may still be a great story, but no one wants to hear good ol’ Bill tell it.

“But the CG is amazing! And the cinematography is great!,” you might say. Yeah, all right, but it is still CG. And maybe it’s just me, but I have an upper bound on how awe-stricken I can get by CG.

You might retort, “But, c’mon, Bill Murray as Baloo and Christopher Walken as King Louie—you can’t beat that!”

Well, fine, you got me there. Murray and Walken can’t be beat. They do a great job. They add serious warmth and personability to this movie.


But is that enough? Not this time.