By Matt Duncan
Coastal View News
Abraham Lincoln had his moments. One can just imagine being
there when Lincoln delivered his Gettysburg address, for instance, or when he
signed the Emancipation Proclamation. Inspiring stuff. Too bad we don’t have
videos or anything.
What we do have is Steven Spielberg. In “Lincoln”, Spielberg
strings together as many inspiring moments as possible. “Lincoln” is a
highlight reel. It’s Honest Abe’s Greatest Hits. Except, like the Beatles or
the Rolling Stones, Lincoln had so many greatest hits that you cannot put them
all in just one collection. You could imagine “Lincoln: The Early Years”, in
which Lincoln grows up, becomes a lawyer, debates Frederick Douglas, etc. Then
there might be “Lincoln: Rise to the Presidency” or “Lincoln: Preserving the Union”.
Spielberg went with the greatest hits movie about Lincoln’s
push to get the 13th Amendment (which abolishes slavery) ratified. Here
is the situation. The Civil War is almost over. The North is going to win. The
South knows it, but is having a hard time admitting it. Lincoln really wants
the war to be over, and apparently, so does everyone else. Thus, a lot of
people think that the best thing for Lincoln to do is to focus on ending the
war, and to save the slavery issue for when the dust settles.
Lincoln disagrees. He thinks that the 13th
Amendment has to be passed before the
Civil War is over. Lincoln figures that if the South rejoins the union with
slavery intact, people will forget about the amendment—because the newly
recognized southern lawmakers will vehemently oppose the amendment and/or
because other politicians will not want to rock the boat, so to speak. So Lincoln
presses on.
The problem is that the folks from the South are less likely
to join back up with the North if they know that slavery is going to be banned.
It is kind of like one side refusing to put something on the negotiating table while
the other side refuses to move forward without that thing on the table. It is
gridlock—a political tightrope that few (very few, apparently) can walk.
“Lincoln” is scene after scene after scene of stirring
speeches, dramatic poses, and memorable one-liners. It really is a greatest
hits album. It is one where Lincoln gets a lot of his famous buddies together—e.g.,
Thaddeus Stevens (Tommy Lee Jones), Ulysses S. Grant (Jared Harris), Mary Todd
Lincoln (Sally Field), and Robert Lincoln (Joseph Gordon-Levitt)—but none them
is as good as Lincoln himself (Daniel Day-Lewis). That is to say, “Lincoln” is
chock full of important characters and famous actors delivering heroic and
inspiring lines, but to be honest, everyone just wants to see Lincoln/Daniel
Day-Lewis do his thing.
Daniel Day-Lewis is great, of course. It is hard to think of
another living actor who is so intensely and so justly revered. His performance
as Lincoln is distinctive, iconic, interesting and entertaining. It is larger-than-life,
but also remarkably real. It is a
truly special performance.
But is this movie special? I think not. “Lincoln” is so absolutely
jam-packed with inspirational speeches and one-liners that, oddly enough, some
of the drama and intrigue evaporates. It is just too much for one sitting.
Look, I like watching highlight reels and slam-dunk contests
as much as the next person. I think it is really cool and impressive when
LeBron James spins eight times, puts the ball behind his back, between his
legs, in one ear and out the other—all in mid-air—and then dunks it like he
does this every day. But there is also a reason why I would rather watch an
actual contest, even if (or maybe because) there is an honest-to-goodness
chance that my team might lose. It’s just more interesting.
So what I want to say is that “Lincoln” is impressive. It’s
just not that interesting.
Am I the only one who thinks Daniel Day-Lewis shouldn't have won the Oscar for Lincoln? To me, he played the iconic character... but I couldn't see Lincoln as a man, a real person. He was a larger than life, intelligent, wise man... but I didn't get a sense of who he was. That was the flaw of the film for me.
ReplyDeleteI also think Joaquin Phoenix was much better in The Master, and I prefer Hugh Jackman's performance in Les Miserables (because not only did he sing and act... but he gave one of the most emotional performances I've ever seen).
I just found Lincoln to be boring, stale, and one of the biggest let downs of the year. I completely agree, the drama and intrigue just evaporates, especially after the 76th quote from Lincoln.
Hey, thanks for your thoughts. I definitely agree that Day-Lewis shouldn't have won best actor--not because it wasn't a great performance, but because the character (or how he was written) was not particularly interesting. I think Phoenix should have won. That was a wonderful performance.
Delete